Lawyers and Access to Justice

SoftSettle Support

According to the American Bar Association’s (A.B.A.) Model Rules of Professional Conduct, “[a] lawyer is a representative of clients, an officer of the legal system and a public citizen having special responsibility for the quality of justice.”

A lawyer’s varied roles include advisor, advocate, negotiator, intermediary, and evaluator. Lawyers are generally concerned only with legal issues and conditions that directly affect a specific case. In addition, the legal profession commonly reflects an individualistic and non-collaborative view. Finally, social justice is not an explicit goal of the legal profession. Lawyers see justice as the efficient result of an adversarial system; as long as they serve their clients well, justice is served in that process.

Attorneys have a central commitment to serve their clients. They act as advocates for their clients, help their clients determine what their needs are, and then, help them to meet those needs. Advocates use a problem-solving approach to address their clients’ needs and resolve issues. Hence these professionals could be deemed to be social workers considering the public interest and so far as focussing the life of the people with direct services which could facilitate their clients with conveniences like short period for attaining justice at most reasonable expenses and at the most stimulating vision in respect of scheming win-win propositions for the contesting parties.

So far as the lawyers are infected with the judicial system resulting out of heavy, tardy and tedious court litigation, there may be remote possibility on their part of the lawyers to get inclined towards low volume remunerated automated online dispute resolutions. Lawyers are aware of the fact that they involve in the conflict areas taken to court trials include expense, which a common client finds it difficult to co-ordinate or afford along with other discomforts like time pressure and other related legal hindrances. The lawyers may be probably in the process of realising the issues of their existing as well as prospective clients.

A lawyer’s goal is to win the case for his client, and in order to do so, it is usually necessary and appropriate to give advice to the client. Hence there is a chance for a lawyer taking the baton of a social worker rather helping his clients than merely advising them. The introduction of the platform Soft Settle could cater to the requirements of the lawyer to play the role of a social worker. He is not confined to mere advising the clients but helps the clients to come out of the troubles he has been confronted with.

Legal community is going to be encountered with certain challenges as a result of many functions traditionally performed by lawyers will be soon replaced by software systems. The integration of technology into the practice of law has been advantageous for the clients so far the basic legal activities to the effect of dispute resolution would be carried out with ease, flexibility, cost reduction, fast, fair and efficient.

SoftSettle Support has evolved research methods to create technologies, which are needed for realizing the promise of effective software support for resolving complex disputes coming under certain categorized areas. SoftSettle Support avoids human intervention to an extent to conduct the dispute resolution procedure and activities on their own. At the same time other significant issue taken into consideration while designing these devices is about the role of human dispute resolution agent or expert neutral in the online resolution system and the job better to be left over to automated (software) solutions. The execution of the justice has entered a revolutionized phase.

The access to justice has become very easy, fast, fair and efficient with the introduction of Artificial intelligence in the area of dispute resolution and www.softsettle.com has been organized with more stability and consistency so as to counter certain challenges likely to be posed by the conflicting situations in different areas.

Hence the lawyers are invited to test the automation in respect of accessing the justice straight forwardly and effortlessly. Realising the fact that litigation is adversarial, which means less regard to fair solution, court decisions might not be acceptable to either party and further adjudication of court results in win-lose scenario and not a mutually acceptable decision, it is time for the lawyers to ponder over a new means for accessing fast and fair justice.  Let the hope rests with the new beginning in the area of justice ignited with the help of artificial intelligence being promoted by SoftSettle Support.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *